Health Care is a right.

The Coalition for Wisconsin Health
__________________________________________

clear Main Page
WI Health Security Act
Petition Drive (pdf)
News /Updates
CWH Brochure 1 (pdf)
CWH Brochure 2 (pdf)
Health Care Statistics
Natl. Health Insurance
(HR 676)
(pdf)
Single Payer Facts
Fundraiser
Membership
Contact
Links
clearclear
PDF files require Acrobat Reader. Download a free copy of Acrobat Reader from Adobe.com

Acrobat reader

News Updates - Page One | Two

clear
Coalition Newsletter Archives:
Winter 2006-2007 Newsletter (pdf)
Summer 2006 Newsletter (pdf)
Winter 2005-06 Newsletter (pdf)
Fall 2005 Newsletter (pdf)
Summer 2005 Newsletter (pdf)
Fall 2004 Newsletter (pdf - 7MB)
Volume  5,  Autumn 2003 (pdf format)
Volume 4, Winter 2001 (pdf format)
clear
The Wisconsin Health Security Act: A necessity for people, business, and the economy
By Linda F. Farley, MD; Eugene S. Farley, MD, MPH
Wisconsin Medical Journal, volume: 104, no. 8 (late 2005)

In that same issue see also "Starting the health care debate in Congress" by US Senator Russ Feingold, who, when he was in the State Legislature, was lead author of what is now the Wisconsin Health Security Act.

clear
Comprehensive health care for all in Wisconsin should not be just a dream  By Paul Kusuda
Asian Wisconzine Vol. I No. 12, December 2005
clear
Free corporations from health expenses  By Jack Lohman and Dr. Eugene Farley
Milwaukee's Business Journal - from the September 2, 2005 print edition
clear
Inaction on health care is inexcusable
By U.S. Senator Russ Feingold
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel guest column ~ May 5, 2005
clear
HEALTH CARE FOR ALL!  Speech Text in pdf.
clear

2003 AB229/SB90  - By Katie Wenban (4/04) FULL STORY

clear
EMAIL TO WEBSITE:

"..... are you trying to turn America into a Socialist\Marxist country? Just look to any country that has "government" health care; they're going broke, although not just because of the health care. The single payer plan would soon run out of money, just like Social Security and Medicaid. Sorry, health care is NOT a right, and you should not advertise it on your site, because that is actionable, and a lie. You do not have a right to health care; an education; a car; a house, etc. Badger Care is bad enough, and yet you want to create another huge government-run institution. Could one of you show me where in the Bill of Rights it says that when I turn a certain age, I can steal money from my neighbor to pay for my drugs and health care? I'd really like to see it. Damn Comunists"

EMAIL RESPONSE:

Dec 18, 2003

Thank you for your interest in the Coalition for Wisconsin Health. In a socialist/marxist society, very likely the hospitals, clinics, and equipment would be government owned. We are certainly not advocating that type of system. We are, however, talking about "socialized" insurance. Right now there are people who can afford health insurance in this country but are not allowed to purchase it because they have a pre-existing condition. Denial of insurance coverage is about the last legal form of discrimination we allow in this country.

Health care is a fundamental right because the framer's identified life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness as the basis of American democracy. If a poor person, or a person with a pre-existing condition, or a person on Badger Care cannot obtain the same high quality health care that is available to the well-insured then we are identifying a class of individuals who are not entitled to live as long as the fortunate. In fact, Canada, Sweden, Germany, France and a host of other countries with national health systems have better infant mortality rates and longer life expectancy than we have in the United States. The patients in Beverly Hills hospitals are certainly not to blame for our system's poor performance.

Our plan is not interested in creating any government run institution. We would create a Health Care Trust Fund, pool all the money that individuals and government currently spend on health care (government already pays 60% of the annual tab in this country). Administration of this fund would be bid out to the major health underwriters. The GAO conservatively estimates that we could save 20% in overhead costs by creating such a single source of payment to doctors, hospitals, and clinics (which would all continue to be privately owned).

We could use the size and strength of our insurance pool, all Wisconsin residents (or all United States residents in a national plan), to negotiate for better rates, less expensive prescription medications, and preventative care. Many of the programs you seem unhappy about such as Badger Care, Medicare and Medicaid were created by the government to help individuals that insurance companies were eliminating for obvious reasons. You make more profit by insuring healthy people. The real purpose of insurance is to spread risk so that a loss or a claim is not devastating to any member of the group. If we are going to insist that government pay for all the sickest individuals in our health system, why not include all the healthy individuals as well and create the largest possible risk sharing pool?

I honestly believe that we deserve the best health system in the world. We are already paying for it. The Coalition for Wisconsin Health believes that if we administer the system responsibly we can cover everyone for what we already pay. I also run a small business and in the last 10 years my postage costs have risen about 8 or 9 %, my rent has stayed about the same because I can negotiate and find good deals. Printing has actually gone down because new technology has made it quicker, easier and less expensive. Our health insurance premiums are up over 140% in that same ten year period. Double digit increases are the norm. I would not tolerate price increases like this in any other area of business, yet if I want health coverage for my employees I have to pay. I don't know about you, but the vast majority of business people in this country can not tolerate these spiraling costs much longer. As you will see from the news item I have attached, the insurers that will thrive in the future are the ones that will position themselves favorably for the changes that are inevitable.

I visited with a Wisconsin Congressman in Washington a few years ago. He told me that everyone in Washington knows we will have a national system of health care by 2025. By that time the baby-boomers will have aged and the programs you have criticized will be obsolete and unable to keep pace with demand. Washington knows that you don't get elected and you don't stay elected unless the great majority have access to the American dream of life, liberty and consumer satisfaction. The Coalition for Wisconsin Health wants to fix a costly, inefficient and unfair system sooner rather than later. It's time to stop paying the price for having uninsured Americans.

Sincerely,
Art Taggart
Co-chair Coalition for Wisconsin Health

clear
Insurance Company CEO Predicts U.S. Turning to National Health Insurance
Highmark exec positioning company to capitalize on the "inevitable"
Source(s): Pamela Gaynor, The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Dec. 11)

Kenneth Melani, CEO of Highmark Inc., the nation's eleventh largest health insurer, said that he believes the U.S. "will inevitably move toward a national health insurance plan." Speaking at the University of Pittsburgh's Graduate School of Public Health, Melani said that soaring medical costs due to greater demand for health services by an aging population, new technology, labor costs and litigation are "pushing insurance premiums beyond affordability for businesses and individuals," but without "corresponding gains in life expectancy." Melani predicts "a backlash" from voters, but said he is not "necessarily opposed" to national health insurance and is positioning his company to capitalize on it if it happens.

clear
clear

clear